Phrembah (a potato-like mystery) (phrembah) wrote,
Phrembah (a potato-like mystery)
phrembah

Yes!

I have always wanted to install James Bond style weapons on my automobile, but for some reason I always thought they would be illegal.  Now I wonder.  If the Second Amendment really does allow us to keep and bear arms of any kind, including assault weapons of any magnitude or capacity, how does that God-given right not extend to my vehicle?  Why can I not mount a Vulcan 20mm cannon like they have on F16s on the roof of my vehicle.  If I “feel threatened” and feel I must “stand my ground,” why should I risk being outgunned by some gang bangin’ drug cartel member?  That’s what I wanna know.  Why am I not entitled to bear arms that would obliterate any other vehicle on the road in less than a second?  I would think that the right to bear arms would include the right to bear effective arms.  None of this bringing Skittles and iced tea to a gun fight stuff.  Come prepared.  Which means always come prepared.

See, there's a couple of very important concepts here:

1)  That, in taking up and bearing arms, you, in that instant, become a well-regulated militia in the eyes of God and therefore can do no wrong.

2)  That the God-given right to bear arms automatically confers the right to bear effective arms, meaning that if those who might cause you to feel threatened possess tank-killer Gatling guns, you, too, are entitled to possess tank-killer weapons of one kind or another.

Cool!  I can legally build and weaponize my own drone!
Tags: brain fart, rant
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments